Update February 28 2023

MPOX at CROI2023 – 7 minute read

MPOX IN PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV AND CD4 COUNTS < 350 CELLS/MM3: A

GLOBAL CASE SERIES

Conclusion: In our case series in PLWH with MPOX, severe systemic

complications and deaths occurred most commonly in persons with CD4 < 100

cells/mm3 and viraemia.

IMPACT OF VACCINATION ON MPOX INCIDENCE IN MSM ON PrEP IN THE

ANRS 174 DOXYVAC TRIAL

Conclusion: In France, MVA-BN vaccination in summer 2022 conferred

high-level protection against mpox infection in highly-at-risk MSM on PrEP.

In this study population, sexual behavior change did not seem to play a role in

reduction of mpox incidence.

HOUSEHOLD TRANSMISSION OF MPOX TO CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS

Conclusion: Among children with household contact to an adult with MPOX

in California, only 14% developed symptoms consistent with MPOX, and less

than 5% ultimately tested positive. The secondary attack rate may have been

underestimated because one-third of symptomatic children were not tested.

While the risk of household transmission is low, pediatric household contacts

should be offered post-exposure prophylaxis to prevent MPOX spread.

LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT OF VIRAL SHEDDING AMONG PATIENTS WITH

MPOX IN TORONTO, CANADA

Conclusion: Mpox virus genetic material may remain detectable in multiple

anatomic compartments for up to 8 weeks after symptom onset. Correlation

with infectivity requires further study.

MPOX DNA CLEARANCE IN SEMEN OVER SIX MONTHS FOLLOW-UP

Conclusion: These preliminary findings from this cohort of individuals

highlight that viral DNA clearance in seminal fluid samples from people

diagnosed with mpox infection was mostly observed within 2 weeks since first

positive test. These findings suggest that semen testing and prolonged use of

condoms after mpox infection may be necessary.

NEUTRALIZING AND T CELL RESPONSE AGAINST MPOX VIRUS AFTER

MVA-BN VACCINE

Conclusion: The first/single dose of MVA-BN triggers a humoral and cellular

response with nAbs response greater in primed vs. non-primed participants

independently of age. No evidence that HiSXV effect on nAbs response to

MVA-BN differed by HIV status. (Primed=historically small pix vaccinated)

COMPARISON OF SUBCUTANEOUS VERSUS INTRADERMAL ROUTE OF

ADMINISTRATION OF MVA VACCINE

Conclusion: MVA-BN was generally well tolerated; S-AEFIs were reported more

frequently by ID vaccine recipients as well as LSI-AEFI, apart from more frequent

local pain after SC. A larger increase in immunological markers was observed

with ID vs. SC administration, particularly for IgG and nAb. ID route proved to be

safe and immunogenic.

HUMORAL AND CELLULAR IMMUNE RESPONSE AFTER 3 MONTHS FROM

MPOX VIRUS INFECTION

Conclusion: Analysis of immune response after 3 months from MPXV infection

showed detectable IgG and nAb and increased CM, EM, and MVA-specific

responding T-cells, regardless of HIV infection, suggesting the possible

expansion of a protective memory/effector T-cells phenotype and the

persistence of immune protection.

IMMUNE RESPONSES AND VIRAL DYNAMICS AFTER MPOX INFECTION IN THE

2022 OUTBREAK

Conclusion: In our cohort, PWH with CD4+ >450/μL had a similar clinical

presentation of Mpox to HIVneg individuals. Magnitude of humoral immune

responses at the time of diagnosis was associated with a milder presentation

and a shorter and faster viral clearance of Mpox DNA in skin lesions. These

results may inform isolation strategies

NOVEL SEROASSAYS DETECT MPOX-SPECIFIC AND VACCINE-INDUCED

ORTHOPOXVIRUS IMMUNITY

Conclusion: We developed and validated the first mpox-specific seroassay

which uses the complete B21R peptide, which can distinguish recent infection

from vaccination, which in turn was associated with a robust E8L antibody

response. Collectively, our assays provide tools for conducting vaccine response

and immunosurveillance studies to longitudinally detect immunity to MPXV,

determine the true prevalence of MPXV infection and identify asymptomatic

community spread.

CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF MPOX SEVERITY IN AN ITALIAN MULTICENTER

COHORT (MPOX-ICONA)

Conclusion: We found that pts presenting with fever, facial/anal lesions, and

concurrent STIs may develop more severe Mpox. Moreover, higher VL in URT

during the first week after symptoms onset was associated with severe disease.

Our findings may serve to guide management of pts with Mpox in terms of need

for hospitalization and drug therapy. Finally, our study claims an urgent need

to assess whether the persistence of MPXV in biological samples after clinical

recovery may lead to a status of persistent infectivity.

SEVERE MPOX AMONG PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV RECEIVING TECOVIRIMAT

IN NEW YORK CITY

Conclusion: This group of PWH with advanced HIV had severe mpox

manifestations and poor response to tecovirimat. Early and extended

tecovirimat with coadministration of other mpox treatments in the setting of

limited options is important to try to improve outcomes. Findings of severe

disease and high mortality highlight the urgency of mitigating deep social

inequities and high-quality research to optimize care in this group of PWH.

MANAGEMENT OF MPOX IN PWH ATTENDING A SEXUAL HEALTH

DEPARTMENT IN LONDON, UK

Conclusion: Despite low hospitalization rates in PWH with MPOX, medical

complications and STI rates requiring further management are significantly

high. Further comparative analysis with people without HIV and PWH with

severe immunodepression are needed to define risk factors for hospitalization

and clinical complications.

MOSAIC CLADE 2B MPOX COHORT STUDY: CLINICAL CHARACTERISATION

AND OUTCOMES

Conclusion: MOSAIC is an international study describing characteristics and

outcomes of Clade 2b Mpox; it does not support direct comparison between

tecovirimat-treated and non-treated patients. Lesions and symptoms resolved

within 28 days in most uncomplicated cases with supportive treatment without

hospitalisation. A higher proportion of patients presented with complications at

baseline in the tecovirimat-treated group. There was also a lower proportion of

patients in this group whose lesions had resolved with no serious complications

at D28.

DEVELOPMENT AND PILOT OF AN MPOX SEVERITY SCORING SYSTEM

(MPOX-SSS)

Conclusion: Our pilot MPOX-SSS was able to produce a severity score

retrospectively from 86% of charts, demonstrated good discrimination with

statistically higher scores in groups expected to have more severe disease, and

was able to distinguish change over time for individual patients that correlated

with clinical illness. We propose this tool be assessed for utility in clinical

trials of mpox treatment, in prospective observational cohort studies, and in

comparisons of illness caused by different mpox clades.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF MPOX IN PEOPLE WITH AND WITHOUT HIV

Conclusion: In this cohort of mpox cases there was a high prevalence of

well-controlled HIV co-infection, but we find no evidence that PLWH experience

more severe mpox.. Whilst there are a higher proportion of hospitalisations, this

is not statistically significant and is likely to be impacted by additional caution

shown by clinicians in making decisions around mpox care in these patients. All

other outcomes analysed indicate that mpox infections are of similar severity in

people with and without HIV, providing reassurance for patients and clinicians

providing future care for patients with mpox and HIV co-infection.

MPOX AMONG MSM IN THE NETHERLANDS PRIOR TO MAY 2022, A

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Conclusion: The first mpox cases in the Netherlands coincided with the

first cases reported in the United Kingdom, Spain and Portugal. We found no

evidence of widespread hMPXV transmission in Dutch sexual networks of MSM

prior to May 2022. Likely, the hMPXV outbreak expanded across Europe within

a short period in the spring of 2022 in an international highly intertwined

network of sexually active MSM.

CHANGES IN SEXUAL BEHAVIORS DUE TO MPOX: A CROSS-SECTIONAL

STUDY OF SGM IN ILLINOIS

Conclusion: SGM YYA in Illinois overwhelmingly reported reducing sexual

contact due to the mpox outbreak. Vaccinated individuals were more likely to

report sexual activity and a greater number of prophylactic activities. Thus, sexpositive

and harm reduction messaging strategies are likely to be more effective

than abstinence-only prevention, which may further stigmatize marginalized

groups.

STIGMA RELATED TO HUMAN MPOX VIRUS AMONG MSM IN THE US, AUGUST

2022

Conclusion: There was low overall prevalence of mpox-related stigma among

MSM in August 2022. These data suggest that messages developed by CDC and

others about mpox and how to protect oneself from mpox infection did not lead

to widespread stigma for this sample of MSM in the US.

HIGH LEVEL OF MPOX KNOWLEDGE AND STIGMA AMONG LGBTQIA+

COMMUNITIES IN BRAZIL

Conclusion: Our results show high rates of mpox knowledge in the LGBTQIA+

communities. Expand access to gender competent care is critical to avoid

underdiagnosis and fight stigma and discrimination.

CHARACTERISTICS AND DISPARITIES AMONG HOSPITALIZED PERSONS WITH

MPOX IN CALIFORNIA

Conclusion: Among persons with mpox and HIV, more hospitalized cases had

uncontrolled HIV and lived in communities with fewer opportunities to lead

healthy lives. Among persons with mpox and without HIV, more that were

hospitalized had diabetes or exfoliative skin disorders. Vaccination and rapid

access to testing and treatment should be prioritized in these groups.

MPOX VIRUS INFECTION IS MORE SEVERE IN PATIENTS WITH

UNCONTROLLED HIV INFECTION

Conclusion: PLWH, considered as a whole, are not at a greater risk of MPXV

severe disease. However, those with uncontrolled HIV infection, due to lack of

effective ART, develop more severe outcomes. Efforts should be done to increase

HIV testing and to ensure linkage to HIV care services. In this setting, ART must

be immediately started.

IMPACT OF HIV INFECTION ON MPOX-RELATED HOSPITALIZATIONS IN

BRAZIL

Conclusion: Our findings suggest an association between worse outcomes

in the HIV care continuum and mpox-related hospitalizations. Advanced

immunosuppression (CD4< 200) contributed to more severe clinical

presentations and death. Public health strategies to mitigate HIV late

presentation and the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to the HIV care

continuum are urgently needed.

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE 2022 MPOX OUTBREAK IN A SOUTHEASTERN US

CITY

Conclusion: Clinical presentation of mpox in Atlanta was similar to other

reports; however, our cohort had a higher burden of HIV co-infection. Severe

mpox disease was observed at higher frequency in individuals with uncontrolled

HIV, indicating an urgent need to better understand the pathogenesis of

HIV-mpox interactions and to develop better prevention and treatment options

for PWH.

CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG IN- AND OUTPATIENTS WITH MPOX IN AN

URBAN HEALTH SYSTEM

Conclusion: In this multi-hospital system, a significant proportion of mpox

patients required hospitalization. Immunosuppression and HIV-1 viremia was

associated with hospitalization for mpox. Achieving viral suppression and mpox

immunization should be prioritized among those at risk.

HIV CARE AND PREVENTION CHARACTERISTICS AMONG PERSONS WITH

MPOX AND HIV, TEXAS 2022

Conclusion: Prevalence of HIV infection among persons with mpox was high,

similar to other findings. The majority of persons with mpox and HIV infection

were diagnosed with HIV more than 5 years ago and had HIV laboratory data

signifying utilization of HIV care services in the past year. The disproportionate

impact of mpox on those with HIV infection reinforces the importance of

offering HIV screening testing to persons seeking care for mpox and focusing

public health efforts on linkage or re-linkage to HIV care services as needed.

MPOX OUTBREAK IN PLWHA AND PrEP USERS IN A BRAZILIAN STI CENTER:

DIFFERENT CHALLENGES

Conclusion: The Mpox outbreak in Brazil curbed in September, possibly as a

result of the strong mobilization of the LGBTQIA+ community. The vast majority

of our study participants were PLWHA and PrEP users. PLWA in our study

presented more frequently with extragenital involvement than PrEP users,

possibly due to a weakened immune response of PLWHA to contain the spread to

distant areas. In low-incoming countries with limited diagnostic resources, the

development of an epidemiological and clinical screening prioritizing testing in

MSM, young ,with fever, adenomegaly and genital lesions, could be a strategy

to be implemented.

MPOX IN THE CONTEXT OF POPULATION-LEVEL HIV TREATMENT AND HIV

PrEP PROGRAMS IN BC

Conclusion: A high proportion of mpox cases in BC were prescribed HIV PrEP,

consistent with overlapping risk behaviour and eligibility criteria for HIV PrEP

with mpox transmission and vaccine eligibility. A smaller proportion of the more

heterogeneous HIV Tx clients was similarly affected by mpox. The decline in

mpox cases suggests a potential impact of mpox vaccine uptake and/or altered

client behaviour. Cases of concurrent diagnosis of HIV and mpox emphasize the

importance of screening for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, in

persons being evaluated for mpox.

CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED WITH MPOX DURING THE

2022 US OUTBREAK

Conclusion: Mpox infection in the current U.S. outbreak has been associated

with severe morbidity and mortality, particularly among persons with AIDS. The

disproportionate burden of severe mpox among persons of color and persons

experiencing homelessness echoes inequities seen in the continuum of care

for PWH. Providers should test sexually active patients with suspected mpox

infection for HIV and other sexually-transmitted infections as indicated at the

time of mpox testing. Engaging all PWH in care remains a critical public health

priority, with additional efforts in HIV outreach and care retention needed to

reduce the population at risk for severe mpox.

EQUITY FOCUSED EVALUATION OF MPOX CARE METRICS IN KING COUNTY,

WA

Conclusion: Public Health and healthcare organizations rapidly scaled-up

mpox testing and treatment over the course of the 5-month epidemic allowing

for most patients to receive TPOXX without significant racial disparities. Testing

and treatment was largely dependent on a single sexual health clinic and

university-affiliated sites.

DEMOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MPOX WITHIN A NEW

YORK CITY HEALTH SYSTEM

Conclusion: In a diverse cohort of mpox patients, treatment with tecovirimat

was well tolerated and associated with minimal adverse effects. The majority

of hospitalizations occurred in patients with underlying immunocompromising

conditions.

MPOX INFECTION IN WOMEN: A CASE SERIES FROM BRAZIL

Conclusion: We describe different epidemiological, behavior and clinical

profiles of mpox among women and men. The milder mpox clinical presentation

in women can be related to their lower HIV prevalence compared to men. Health

services must provide a comprehensive clinical and epidemiological assessment

that accounts for gender diversity to address the knowledge gaps regarding the

impact of mpox on both cisgender and transgender women.

Update February 17 2023

Fourth meeting of the WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committee on mpox

The Emergency Committee acknowledged the progress made in the global response to the multi-country outbreak of mpox and the further decline in the number of reported cases since the last meeting. The Committee observed that a few countries continued to see a sustained incidence of illness; the Committee is also of the view that underreported detection and under-reporting of confirmed cases of illness in other regions is likely. Therefore, the Committee considered various options to sustain attention and resources to control the outbreak and advised maintaining the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), while beginning to consider plans to integrate mpox prevention, preparedness and response within national surveillance and control programmes, including for HIV and other sexually transmissible infections.The WHO European Region reported that as of 3 February, 43 countries and territories have not detected any new cases in the past three months. While 18 countries and territories continue to report recent local human-to-human transmission, case numbers have decreased significantly. Future risks of outbreaks relate to the ongoing importation, forthcoming mass gatherings, potential reduced vaccination and surveillance, limited access to testing and behaviour change/. To tackle this, the Region is working towards a five-year plan to achieve and sustain the elimination of mpox in all Member States through engagement with affected communities and integrating intervention into the sexual health programs, to be discussed at the Regional Committee in autumn 2023.The Region of the Americas reported a stable number of cases in the last six weeks, with 200-250 cases per week, and 4% of cases occurring in women. In addition, while the vaccine supply is limited, seven countries have started vaccination. Risk communication and community engagement interventions are being delivered through HIV community-based networks.

The Committee reconvened in a closed meeting to examine the questions in relation to whether the event continues to constitute a PHEIC, and if so, to consider the proposed Temporary Recommendations, drafted by the WHO Secretariat in accordance with IHR provisions. The Secretariat provided a presentation on the legal provisions under the IHR in relation to the determination of a PHEIC, and the issuance of Temporary Recommendations.

Updated January 31

HIV.gov convened a meeting of federal HIV communications leadership to start the new year off with the critical message that integrating mpox messaging into our ongoing communications is foundational to our HIV response for 2023. While we recognize the important work that has been done to dramatically decrease new mpox cases, we cannot take our foot off the pedal, as there is still critical work needed to increase and routinize mpox vaccinations.

We were fortunate to hear about mpox in the context of HIV and the importance of an equity-centered response from White House and other U.S. Government leaders. Demetre C. Daskalakis, MD, MPH, Director, CDC Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Deputy Coordinator, White House National Mpox Response noted that mpox continues to be a public health issue that disproportionately impacts people with HIV, and data suggest that approximately 40% of people diagnosed with mpox in the United States also have HIV. He also highlighted important action steps (see below) and resource videos to move us forward.

Dr-Daskalakis

Beginning the meeting, Kaye Hayes, MPA, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Infectious Disease and Director of the Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy, emphasized the Biden-Harris Administration’s focus on the importance of equity in the mpox response to ensure that no communities are left behind. She also highlighted the intentionality of the work surrounding mpox, including hearing directly from populations most likely to be affected by mpox but least likely to be vaccinated to better understand what is working and what needs to be improved in our response.

Decline in Mpox Cases

During the meeting, Dr. Daskalakis noted that in the U.S., there has been around a 99% reduction in the number of daily mpox cases since the peak of the mpox outbreak in summer 2022. He attributed this to 1) effective communications to gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men, as well as transgender individuals and other gender-diverse individuals; 2) the mpox vaccine; and 3) swift response from the LGBTQI+ community.

Syndemics and Mpox

Dr. Daskalakis also discussed mpox in the context of syndemics, noting that mpox infection does not occur in isolation. The September 2022 CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report showed that HIV or recent sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are common among people with mpox. Dr. Daskalakis thus stressed the importance of continuing to ensure equitable access to mpox screening, prevention, and treatment, including both prioritizing people with HIV and STIs for mpox vaccination and offering HIV and STI screening for people evaluated for mpox. He also emphasized the need to encourage those who haven’t received their second vaccinations to do so.

“We cannot take mpox in isolation,” he asserted. “We need to put it in the context of the interacting epidemics and the interacting social determinants of health that make mpox worse, or that propel mpox transmission.”

The Way-Forward

Dr. Daskalakis discussed navigating the future of the domestic response to mpox. As of the time of the meeting, there were 1,152,073 U.S. mpox vaccines administered. To get to zero mpox cases, he noted we must focus on communications to increase mpox vaccinations and magnify our communications for mpox vaccine administration. [Note: imagery promoting this blog will include this statement]. He also encouraged increased engagement with partners via social media, as well as official government websites, such as HIV.gov.

Harold Phillips, Director, The White House Office of National AIDS Policy, offered a closing message to attendees. He noted that the mpox response was “a true demonstration of when we use and follow the data and the science and we center the approach with equity, we CAN make a difference.”

Stay up to date on mpox and view the CDC’s Mpox Vaccine Equity Toolkit and their Cases and Data page. Also watch and share HIV.gov’s mpox videos featuring Dr. Daskalakis answering 14 top mpox questions.

Updated January 23

Today, the CDC team updated resources related to mpox. These may be found below

New and Updated CDC Resources:

MMWR: Epidemiology of Human Mpox — Worldwide, 2018–2021 NEW

Strategies for Talking with Patients about Vaccinations for Mpox UPDATED

Autopsy and Handling of Human Remains of Patients with Mpox UPDATED

What’s New & Updated UPDATED

 

Additional Funding Resources:

Mpox Guidance for CDC Grant Recipients

Mpox Considerations for Sexual Health Services (Dear Colleague Letters)

HRSA: Use of Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Funds for Mpox

HUD’s HOPWA (Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS)

SAMHSA: Dear Colleague Letter on Using SAMHSA Grant Resources for Mpox-related Activities

 

Recently Updated—In Case You Missed It: 

MMWR: Mpox Cases Among Cisgender Women and Pregnant Persons — United States, May 11–November 7, 2022

 

Data and Analytics: 

2022 U.S. Mpox Outbreak UPDATED

U.S. Map & Case Count UPDATED

U.S. Mpox Case Trends Reported to CDC UPDATED

Global Map & Case Count UPDATED

Mpox Cases by Age and Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Symptoms UPDATED

Mpox Vaccine Administration U.S. Map UPDATED

Demographics of Patients Receiving TPOXX for Treatment of Mpox UPDATED

Mpox Technical Reports

 

Additional CDC Resources: 

CDC’s Mpox Internet Site

MMWR Mpox Reports

Health Alert Network (HAN)—Severe Manifestations of Mpox

Mpox Vaccine Confidence Insights Report

Mpox Vaccine Equity Pilot Program

Science Brief: Detection and Transmission of Mpox Virus

Clinician FAQs

Mpox Vaccination Program Provider Agreement

Clinician Outreach and Communication Activity (COCA) Call

Clinical Considerations for Treatment and Prophylaxis of Mpox Virus Infection in People with HIV

Additional Intradermal Administration Sites: JYNNEOS Vaccine

Video: How to Administer Intradermal Vaccine in Forearm, Deltoid, and Scapula

Videos on mpox recommendations and updates from CDC leadership and partners

Completing a Death Certificate in the Setting of Mpox

V-safe after Vaccination Health Checker for Mpox Vaccine

V-safe Print Materials

Mpox Toolkit for Correctional and Detention Facilities

Safer Sex, Social Gatherings, and Mpox

Strategies for Talking with Patients about Vaccinations for Mpox

CDC’s Vaccine Equity Efforts in the Peach State- The Atlanta Black Pride Story

Stories from the Mpox Response

CDC-INFO On Demand – Publications

Print Resources

 

Additional Partner Resources: 

Mpox Vaccine Locator (mpoxvaxmap.org)

CDC/IDSA Clinician Call: Updates & Emerging Issues on COVID-19 and Mpox

ASPR: JYNNEOS Mpox Vaccine Distribution by Jurisdiction

ASPR: Operational Planning Guide

Clinicaltrials.gov: STOMP

Study of Tecovirimat for Human Mpox Virus (STOMP)

FDA: Emergency Use Authorization Fact Sheet

HHS amends PREP Act declaration increasing workforce authorized to administer mpox vaccines

HHS: Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act Coverage for Mpox

HHS: Statement From HHS Secretary Becerra on mpox

HHS: U.S. Government Mpox Research Summary

HIV.gov: Addressing Mpox Holistically

HIV.gov: Mpox and People with HIV Videos

NIH: U.S. Clinical Trial Evaluating Antiviral for Mpox Begins

PREP Act Coverage Frequently Asked Questions for Mpox

SAMHSA: Anxiety and Stress Related to Mpox

The White House: A Comprehensive Summary of Federally-Funded Mpox Research Projects

The White House: Mpox Press Briefing (9/28/2022)

WHO: Clinical Management and Infection Prevention and Control of Mpox

WHO: Community Engagement

WHO: WHO recommends new name for monkeypox disease

Published in MMRW today

HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Persons with Monkeypox — Eight U.S. Jurisdictions, May 17–July 22, 2022

 

Monkeypox and HIV

CDC doesn’t know if having HIV increases the likelihood of getting monkeypox. Monkeypox can spread to anyone through prolonged, close, personal, often skin-to-skin contact, as well as through contact with objects, fabrics (clothing, bedding, or towels), and surfaces that have been used by someone with monkeypox, or contact with respiratory secretions, through kissing and other face-to-face contact.

CDC continues to monitor monkeypox among people with HIV. During the current monkeypox outbreak, there does not appear to be more severe monkeypox illness in people who have HIV and are virally suppressed (having less than 200 copies of HIV per milliliter of blood). In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) monkeypox guidance states, “People living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy with suppressed viral load are not considered to be immunosuppressed.” However, people with HIV who are not virally suppressed may be at increased risk for severe illness and death from monkeypox.

Currently there is no treatment approved specifically for monkeypox. However, medicine (antivirals) developed for use in patients with smallpox may help treat people with monkeypox.

At this time, CDC doesn’t have enough data to know whether people who have HIV and are virally suppressed might benefit from taking medicine if they get monkeypox.

Because patients with a weakened immune system may have more severe monkeypox illness, healthcare providers might consider using antiviral medicines (e.g., tecovirimat) or Vaccinia Immune Globulin for these patients. This could include people newly diagnosed with HIV or people with HIV who are not virally suppressed. See: Treatment Information for Healthcare Professionals.

At this time, vaccination is recommended for people with exposures to a probable or confirmed case with monkeypox, for example people who have had close physical contact with someone diagnosed with monkeypox. Vaccination may also be offered to people who had a presumed exposure, such as men who have sex with men who have had multiple sexual partners during the past 14 days in a jurisdiction with known monkeypox activity.

There are currently two licensed vaccines in the United States to prevent smallpox – JYNNEOS and ACAM2000. These smallpox vaccines may provide protection against monkeypox because smallpox and monkeypox are very similar viruses. Only JYNNEOS is FDA approved for the prevention of monkeypox in people 18 and older.

The JYNNEOS vaccine has been studied in people with HIV who are virally suppressed, and they do not have more frequent or severe side effects from the vaccine than people who did not have HIV. The JYNNEOS vaccine seems to be well tolerated, with the most common side effects being injection site pain, redness, swelling and itching. Some recipients also reported muscle pain, headache, fatigue, nausea, and chills. More data are needed to know if this vaccine is tolerated by people newly diagnosed with HIV or by people with HIV who are not virally suppressed. Clinicians should weigh the benefits of vaccination with the unknown risk of an adverse event for a person if their HIV is not virally suppressed.

ACAM2000 has been shown to have more frequent and severe side effects, especially for people with weakened immune systems or who are pregnant, have a heart condition, or skin conditions like eczema, psoriasis, or dermatitis. ACAM2000 is not recommended for people with HIV, even if they are virally suppressed, due to this increased risk of severe side effects.

Data is limited, but most HIV treatment can be safely given with monkeypox treatment and smallpox vaccines. People with HIV should inform their healthcare provider of all their medications to help determine if any interactions exist.

No, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is still effective and should be continued as prescribed.

People with HIV should follow the same recommendations as everyone else to protect themselves from monkeypox.

  • Avoid direct contact with rashes, sores, or scabs on a person with monkeypox, including during intimate contact such as sex. We believe this is currently the most common way that monkeypox is spreading in the U.S.
  • Avoid contact with objects, fabrics (clothing, bedding, or towels), and surfaces that have been used by someone with monkeypox.
  • Avoid contact with respiratory secretions, through kissing and other face-to-face contact from a person with monkeypox.

New Study Documents the Frequent Detection of Monkeypox Virus DNA in Saliva, Semen, and other Clinical Samples 

https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.28.2200503

 Updated June 30, 2022

This week,  the administration released an new fact sheet on Monkey pox. Key is the rollout of a national strategy for smallpox vaccination against monkeypox for people at risk. This follows a decision by Quebec Province to do the same with that province and Montreal being the epicenters of the current outbreak in North America

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/06/28/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administrations-monkeypox-outbreak-response/ 

As part of the monkeypox outbreak response, the Biden-Harris Administration is launching a national strategy to provide vaccines for monkeypox for individuals at higher risk of exposure. The strategy aims to mitigate the spread of the virus in communities where transmission has been the highest and with populations most at risk. This plan distributes the two-dose JYNNEOS vaccine, which the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for protection against smallpox and monkeypox in individuals 18 years and older determined to be at high risk for smallpox or monkeypox infection. States will be offered an equitable allotment based on cases and proportion of the population at risk for severe disease from monkeypox, and the federal government will partner with state, local, and territorial governments in deploying the vaccines.

The goal of the initial phase of the strategy is to slow the spread of the disease. HHS will immediately allocate 56,000 vaccine doses currently in the Strategic National Stockpile to states and territories across the country, prioritizing jurisdictions with the highest number of cases and population at risk. To date, vaccines have been provided only to those who have a confirmed monkeypox exposure. With these doses, CDC is recommending that vaccines be provided to individuals with confirmed monkeypox exposures and presumed exposures. This includes those who had close physical contact with someone diagnosed with monkeypox, those who know their sexual partner was diagnosed with monkeypox, and men who have sex with men who have recently had multiple sex partners in a venue where there was known to be monkeypox or in an area where monkeypox is spreading.

In the coming weeks, HHS expects to receive an additional 240,000 vaccines, which will be made available to a broader population of individuals at risk. HHS will hold another 60,000 vaccines in reserve.

HHS expects more than 750,000 doses to be made available over the summer. An additional 500,000 doses will undergo completion, inspection, and release throughout the fall, totaling 1.6 million doses available this year.

First Case Report of Monkeypox in a Person Living with HIV

An HIV-positive man in his 30s taking Abacavir, Lamivudine and Dolutegravir and with a CD4 + T-cell count above 700 cells/mm3 (normal range 410–1,545 cells/mm3) and HIV viral load < 100 copies/mL, visited a primary care doctor after his return from Europe to Melbourne, Australia. He reported onset of a genital rash 8 days earlier. The rash had started 5 days after he reported unprotected sex with four casual male partners in Europe. The initial symptoms were painless white pustules on the penis that became painful and pruritic. He reported that he developed a fever and malaise 3 days after the first appearance of the penile rash and over the subsequent 5 days, the rash disseminated to his trunk, then more sparingly to the face and limbs while the genital lesions crusted over.

Swabs taken from deroofed skin lesions on the hand, calf and trunk in addition to combined nose throat swabs on the day of hospital admission, were all positive for monkeypox virus using previously described conventional [2] and in-house RT-PCR assays for orthopox and monkeypox viruses. Whole genome sequencing performed as described in the Supplementary material of DNA derived from the skin lesions resulted in the complete recovery of the entire monkeypox genome (MPXV-VIDRL01, Genbank_ID ON631963) with phylogenetic analysis revealing clustering with other monkeypox virus sequences from the May 2022 outbreak in Europe and the United States.

Rapid communication Home  Euro surveillance  Volume 27, Issue 22, 02/Jun/2022 Monkeypox infection presenting as genital rash, Australia Yael Hammerschlag et al

 

Figure 1

 

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in its May 30, 2022, update that it had received reports of 257 confirmed monkeypox cases and approximately 120 suspected cases in 23 countries where the virus is not endemic as of May 26, 2022. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has reported 12 cases in eight states as of May 27, 2022. No deaths have been reported in nonendemic countries. The WHO classifies the global public health risk level posed by monkeypox as moderate.

Background

Monkeypox was first detected in 1958 in laboratory monkeys.1 The first human case of monkeypox was recorded in 1970 in the Democratic Republic of Congo.2 Since then, monkeypox has been reported in humans in other central and western African countries, with occasional cases reported outside of Africa.1

Global Outbreak

In May 2022, more than 120 confirmed or suspected cases of monkeypox have been reported in at least 11 non-African (endemic) countries, including Australia, Belgium, Canada, England, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.2

Historical Context

In 2003, the first monkeypox outbreak outside of Africa was in the United States, when 70 cases in humans were reported, linked to contact with infected pet prairie dogs, which had been housed with Gambian pouched rats imported into the United States from Ghana.3 Monkeypox was reported in travelers from Nigeria to the United States in July 2021 and November 2021.3

2022 US and Global Outbreak

On May 20, 2022, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued an alert urging doctors and state health departments to be vigilant for cases of monkeypox, following confirmation of cases in the US.4, 5 Federal officials say they expect to identify additional infections in the coming days. According to the CDC, it is not clear how people in the cluster outbreaks so far were exposed to the monkeypox virus but cases include people who self-identify as men who have sex with men.6 Public health officials have issued similar alerts in Australia, Belgium, Canada, England, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.

Monkeypox virus is known to spread through close contact with the lesions, bodily fluids and respiratory droplets of infected people or animals or materials contaminated with the virus. Human transmission is thought to occur primarily through respiratory droplets. Investigations are ongoing that the virus may be spreading by sexual contact, following outbreaks of monkeypox in Europe related to two parties in Spain and Belgium, attended primarily by gay men. Although many cases have been reported among men who have sex with men (MSM), and bisexual men, spread may be occurring because the virus was introduced into the community and it has continued to spread there, both by sexual and social contact.

Key Facts about Monkeypox3

  • Monkeypox is caused by monkeypox virus.
  • Monkeypox typically presents clinically with fever, rash, and swollen lymph nodes and may lead to a range of medical complications.7
  • The incubation period is usually 7-14 days but can range from 5-21 days.
  • Monkeypox is usually a self-limited disease with the symptoms lasting from 2 to 4 weeks. Severe cases can occur and the fatality ratio has been around 3-6%.
  • Monkeypox is transmitted to humans through close contact with an infected person (skin lesions, body fluids, respiratory droplets and contaminated materials such as bedding) or animal, or with material contaminated with the virus.
  • The clinical presentation of monkeypox resembles that of smallpox but is less contagious than smallpox and causes less severe illness.
  • Vaccination against smallpox was demonstrated through several observational studies to be about 85% effective in preventing monkeypox. A vaccine based on a modified attenuated vaccinia virus (Ankara strain) was approved for the prevention of monkeypox in 2019.
  • An antiviral agent (tecovirimat) that was developed for smallpox was licensed by the European Medical Association (EMA) for monkeypox in 2022 based on data in animal and human studies. Tecovirimat is not yet widely available.

Summary of CDC Recommendations for Clinicians6

  • If clinicians identify patients with a rash that could be consistent with monkeypox, especially those with a recent travel history to areas reporting monkeypox cases, monkeypox should be considered as a possible diagnosis.
  • The rash associated with monkeypox involves vesicles or pustules that are deep-seated, firm or hard, and well-circumscribed
  • Presenting symptoms typically include fever, chills, the distinctive rash, or new lymphadenopathy; however, onset of perianal or genital lesions in the absence of subjective fever has been reported.
  • Information on infection prevention and control in healthcare settings is provided on the CDC website’s Infection Control page.8
  • Clinicians in the United States should consult their state health department or CDC through the CDC Emergency Operations Center (770) 488-7100 as soon as monkeypox is suspected.
  • Clinicians outside of the United States consult their relevant subnational and national public health authorities for guidance and epidemiological surveillance purposes.

What At-Risk Individuals Should Do6

The CDC advises people who may have symptoms of monkeypox should contact their healthcare provider. This includes anyone who:

  • Traveled to central or west African countries, parts of Europe where monkeypox cases have been reported
  • Reports contact with a person with confirmed or suspected monkeypox

The World Health Organization (WHO) notes that available evidence suggests that those who are most at risk are those who have had close physical contact with someone with monkeypox, and that risk is not limited to men who have sex with men.

 

Notes

[1] Monkeypox goes global: why scientists are on alert Max Kozlov Nature News May 20 2022

[2] CDC Monkeypox https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/index.html Last updated May 20 2022

[3] Monkeypox World Health Organization May 19,2022 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/monkeypox

[4] CDC tells doctors to be on alert for monkeypox as global cases rise Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/05/20/cdc-monkeypox-alert/

[5] Monkeypox in the United States CDC https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/outbreak/us-outbreaks.html

[6] 2022 United States Monkeypox Case https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/outbreak/current.html

[7] Signs and Symptoms CDC https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/symptoms.html

[8] Precautions to Prevent Monkeypox Transmission https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/infection-control-hospital.html